which revision of elise's conclusion best uses a formal tone

Breiz Heurope

2 min read

·

10-03-2025

1

0

Share

Which Revision of Elise's Conclusion Best Uses a Formal Tone?

Introduction: Choosing the right tone for a conclusion is crucial, especially in academic or professional settings. Elise's conclusion needs refinement to achieve a formal tone. Let's analyze different revisions to determine which best achieves this goal. A formal tone avoids colloquialisms, contractions, and overly casual language.

Elise's Original Conclusion (Informal):

Let's say Elise's original conclusion was something like this: "So, yeah, the experiment showed what we thought. It's pretty cool how it all worked out." This is clearly informal.

Revision 1: A Slightly Improved Version

"The experimental results confirmed our hypothesis. The successful outcome is noteworthy." This revision is an improvement. It replaces colloquialisms ("yeah," "pretty cool") with more formal vocabulary. However, it still feels somewhat stiff.

Revision 2: More Formal Language

"The data obtained from the experiment validated the proposed hypothesis. The successful execution of the experimental design is significant." This revision uses more sophisticated vocabulary ("validated," "proposed hypothesis," "execution of the experimental design"). It maintains objectivity and avoids subjective commentary.

Revision 3: Adding Analytical Depth

"The findings of this experiment strongly support the hypothesis. The methodological rigor employed throughout the process contributed significantly to the conclusive results, warranting further investigation into [related area]." This version goes further. It not only employs formal language but also adds analytical depth by mentioning the methodology and suggesting future research. This showcases a sophisticated understanding of the topic.

Revision 4: Most Formal and Concise

"This study successfully validated the proposed hypothesis. The results obtained contribute to a deeper understanding of [topic]." This version is concise, uses precise language ("validated"), and avoids unnecessary words. It is clear, objective, and maintains a formal tone throughout.

Which Revision is Best?

Revision 4 is the most effective. It successfully balances formality with clarity and conciseness. It avoids any informal language or subjective interpretations. While Revision 3 also displays formality, it is slightly less concise and might be considered overly verbose for some contexts. The key to a strong formal conclusion lies in using precise, objective language, avoiding colloquialisms, and focusing on the key findings and their implications.

Key Elements of a Formal Tone in Conclusions:

• Precise Language: Avoid vague words. Use specific terminology relevant to the subject matter.
• Objectivity: Focus on the facts and data, avoiding personal opinions or subjective evaluations.
• Conciseness: Get to the point without unnecessary details or rambling.
• Absence of Colloquialisms: Avoid slang, contractions, and informal phrases.
• Strong Verbs: Use active voice and powerful verbs to convey confidence and precision.

By carefully considering these elements, Elise (and anyone writing a conclusion) can ensure their writing maintains a consistently formal tone. The choice of words significantly impacts the overall impression and credibility of the work.